In April 2025, the world economy was rocked when the United States announced sweeping new import tariffs during President Donald Trump’s presidency. A blanket tariff of 10% was levied on all imports, but much steeper “reciprocal” levels were imposed on some countries, particularly China. Financial markets sprang into action quickly: Japan’s stock market experienced its steepest decline in years, and JP Morgan predicted a 60% likelihood of global recession by year’s end. Allies criticised the action, terming it the death knell of decades of trade liberalisation under the World Trade Organisation umbrella.
The wider implications go far beyond economics. Although the aim is to protect domestic industries, the tariffs have caused supply chains to break down, driven up consumer prices, and opened the door to a new era of retaliatory trade measures around the world.
US tariffs threaten to unravel decades of trade liberalisation and destabilise global supply chains.
Shifting U.S. Tariff Policy: From Free Trade to Protectionism
Since the mid-20th century, the U.S. has sustained low average tariffs as a foundation of its support for multilateral trade systems such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the WTO. However, the Trump administration’s first term (2017–2021) was an abrupt departure from this, citing legal provisions such as Section 232 and 301 to impose tariffs, principally on Chinese imports, on national security and unjust trade grounds.
Trump’s second term has maximised this protectionist turn. As of April 2025, the typical U.S. tariff on Chinese imports had jumped to 124%, says Chad Bown of the Peterson Institute—a sixfold growth compared to Trump’s first term. Even the Biden administration extended these policies, implementing new tariffs on Chinese technology. In May 2024, his administration raised duties on key Chinese tech products, quadrupling electric-vehicle (EV) tariffs to 100% and doubling semiconductor duties to 50%.
Tensions went beyond China. The EU, after a brief ceasefire in the Airbus-Boeing conflict, still faced U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminium. Europe retaliated with tariffs against classic U.S. items such as whiskey and motorcycles. The 2025 tariff spike threatens France and Germany with countermeasures and calls for companies to cut back U.S. investments.
Major U.S. allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Mexico were also in their sights. There was a 25% tariff imposed on imports of North American automobiles, a significant shift away from the liberal trade stance during the 1990s and 2000s.
Economic Fallout: Higher Prices, Shaky Markets
The immediate consequence has been increasing prices for U.S. businesses and consumers. With U.S. dependence on foreign imports—everything from vegetables and auto parts to toys and electronics—the tariffs have quickly made their way onto price tags.
80% of toys marketed in the U.S., for example, are Chinese imports, as are 60% of vegetables. Rosenblatt Securities estimated a top-tier iPhone might ring up at as much as $2,300 if Apple should completely pass through tariff expenses, more than twice its pre-tariff value. Previous analyses support the same results. University of Chicago economists discovered that Trump-era tariff expenditures were absorbed by 75% to 99% by American consumers and companies. Industries being protected might experience gains, while downstream industries (e.g., auto production) lose jobs through increased input expenses.
Markets responded forcefully. Following the April announcement, the Dow Jones declined 4%, the S&P 500 dropped 5%, and the Nasdaq dropped almost 6% in a single day, its worst performance since the COVID-19 crash. Global supply chain companies were particularly hard hit: Apple shares dropped almost 9%, and Nike dropped 14%. Investor anxiety spilt over into equities, causing a weaker U.S. dollar and declining oil prices.
Broken Supply Chains and Spiking Inflation
Chinese imports, some up to 145%, have intensely stretched worldwide supply chains. Firms cancelled orders and postponed deliveries. The Los Angeles Port, among the country’s largest, estimated a 35% reduction in cargo, and shipping firms started skipping sailings or grounding ships. Up to 40% of shipping capacity between the U.S. and China could be suspended if tariffs continue, analysts estimate.
Manufacturers and retailers are seeing shortages and rising prices. Such items as toys, sporting equipment, and baby products—largely imported from China—are in short supply, while auto parts and electronics are more difficult to find. Stockpiling gave a brief cushion, but inventories will not last forever.
Companies are retaliating by hastening “China-plus-one” strategies—relocating manufacturing to Vietnam, India, and Mexico. It is not that simple to duplicate China’s manufacturing capabilities. Decades of investment in logistics, infrastructure, and skilled labour went into it. U.S. Customs has also increased enforcement to prevent transhipment, penalising efforts to divert Chinese products through third nations.
Tariffs are also affecting the shipping industry. The U.S. has levied taxes on Chinese-constructed ships, leading carriers to shun them to save money. Because more than half of U.S. general cargo has historically come in on Chinese-built vessels, this policy risks disrupting fundamental shipping lanes and alliances.
Global Responses and Trade Realignment
Foreign reactions have been diverse but have come quickly. China, for example, increased its overall tariffs on U.S. imports to 148%, targeting wine, coal, and luxury goods. The European Union threatened to retaliate and still imposes tariffs on American metals. Germany and France have called for robust retaliation, but others, such as Japan, South Korea, India, and Mexico, have chosen the diplomatic path. Japanese and Korean auto manufacturers are expanding U.S.-based production to avoid tariffs.
This divergence is a symptom of a wider rebalancing. Nations are increasing economic ties away from the U.S. The EU is concluding trade agreements with Mercosur, Mexico, Switzerland, Malaysia, and India and is also pursuing membership in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)—a turn toward the Asia-Pacific region.
Geopolitical Ripple Effects
Beyond economics, the tariffs are reshaping geopolitics. Many countries feel caught between superpowers. As the Associated Press notes, smaller nations have been “cosying up with China to hedge their bets”. Beijing has capitalised on the chaos, branding itself as a “stabilising force” and a predictable trade partner. Singapore’s prime minister warned that, in practice, the U.S.-China rivalry will force countries to pick sides – even if both powers claim otherwise.
A recent Chatham House report cautioned that Washington’s assertive trade policy threatens to undercut long-standing alliances. Punishing strategic partners such as Japan and South Korea would sap Indo-Pacific cooperation at the very moment when tensions with China and Russia are on the rise. At the same time, Beijing is taking advantage to promote itself as a stable alternative, courting smaller countries and aggressively pushing its development model.
Conclusion: A Fractured Trade Order
The 2025 U.S. tariff spike is a clear departure from the post–World War II liberal trade order. With the U.S. now regarded as an unreliable economic partner, nations are competing to diversify supply chains and create new partnerships. Global institutions such as the WTO and IMF caution that further escalation could reduce global trade by up to 1.5% this year.
Whether the U.S. continues its protectionist stance or not, the damage has been done. The ripple effects are already transforming global trade patterns, redefining geopolitical contours, and possibly leading to a more disjointed world economy.
Leave a Reply